In the past few months there have been repeated discussions regarding the benefits and damage of a mouth and nose covering 1 (MNB) including Community masks. So the recommendation changed from «in the broad population counterproductive »to« unnecessary », to «Possibly protective», to «protects», to «urgent Recommendation »and finally to« compulsory wear ». It is not surprising that this discussion is not scientific, but rather political and emotional. The mask requirement for pupils has been expanded now in many federal states on different levels . But what about the assessment of the proportionality and, above all, the safety of use of mask and covering in children and adolescents?
In this compilation various aspects are shown which require the utmost attention. Enormous health risk for children cannot be ruled out, in fact it is highly probable. In order to demonstrate this in an understandable manner, we will concentrate below on two questions:
The following topics are in further elaboration, these will become published at a later date:
The available data indicate a very likely and unreasonable risk, especially for children. You don't know which Mask types are used, which pressure differences arise and / or whether children have previous illnesses. Health harm is not to exclude. Children wear masks continuously and even longer than (in the context of occupational health Rules and regulations) adults in professional life are allowed!
A strict PROHIBITION for masks in children and adolescents is therefore indicated until proof of safety has been provided.
Bericht-Gefährdung durch die Verwendung von Masken bei Kindern und Jugendlichen
The EFVV (European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance) is an alliance of member-organisations and individual members from 25 European countries. Our member-organisations consist of consumer groups and pro-choice groups whose members in turn include medical professionals and scientists. Their combined memberships exceed 100,000. We call on all Europeans to stand together in a demand for a united vaccination policy based on freedom of choice and informed consent. We believe that mandatory vaccination is not only a serious risk but a violation of human rights and dignity. We therefore demand transparency and caution as well as recognition and concern for the many vaccine-injured in Europe and beyond.